2025.04.07

The intersection of education and politics ~ Hannah Arendt's Perspective

vibration

Hannah Arendt is one of the leading political philosophers and thinkers of the 20th century. Born into a Jewish family in Hanover, Germany, on October 14, 1906, she died in the United States on December 4, 1975. Her life is inextricably linked to the rise of Nazism, World War II, and the Cold War, a time of great change in the world, symbolizing the turbulent 20th century. Filled with intellectual curiosity from an early age, Arendt studied with Martin Heidegger at the University of Marburg and later received her doctorate under Karl Jaspers at the University of Heidelberg. Her academic background spanned philosophy, classics, and theology, and had a profound influence on the subsequent formation of thought.

But it was the rise of the Nazis that determined her life above all. When Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, Arendt fled persecution as a Jew and fled to France. During her time in exile in Paris, she interacted with many Jewish refugees, an experience that deeply imprinted on her thoughts. In 1941, he moved to the United States and settled in New York. There, he worked as a journalist, researcher, and thinker, examining social and political issues from a unique perspective. This series of experiences, especially the tragedy of the Nazi totalitarian regime and the Holocaust, led her to explore the core themes of her thought: totalitarianism, evil, and the human condition. Her ideas go beyond mere recording of historical events and continue to provide profound insights and suggestions for the political and ethical issues facing contemporary society.

Article Contents

Hannah Arendt
- The Foundations of Hannah Arendt's Thought ~ The Origin of Totalitarianism

Hannah Arendt

The Foundations of Hannah Arendt's Thought ~ The Origin of Totalitarianism

An indispensable part of Arendt's thought is her masterpiece The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951. In this major work, I thoroughly analyzed the two totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, Nazi Germany and Soviet Stalinism, and sought to elucidate their origins, mechanisms, and impact on human nature. Arendt saw totalitarianism as a completely new form of political system, different from conventional tyranny and dictatorship, and examined its peculiarities in detail. She pointed out that totalitarianism is not just a concentration or suppression of political power, but a system that penetrates to the root of human thoughts, feelings, and behavior, thoroughly destroying individual freedom and dignity.

In The Origins of Totalitarianism, Arendt explained the process of the formation of totalitarian regimes in three stages. The first stage is the formation of ideologies such as anti-Semitism and racism, and the process by which they permeate society. The second stage is the collapse of the nation-state and the atomization of society. The community and social ties to which individuals belonged are lost, creating a situation in which isolated individuals are subject to mobilization for totalitarian movements. The third stage is the process of establishing totalitarian institutions of control, such as the establishment of secret police and concentration camps, and the thorough application of propaganda. It is important to note that totalitarian regimes do not simply rule by force, but seek to thoroughly control people's thoughts and actions through ideology, propaganda, and fear.

Arendt pointed to the characteristics of modern society, especially the collapse of class society, alienation, and the emergence of mass society as factors that led to the establishment of totalitarian regimes. She analyzed that in modern society, as traditional communities were dismantled and people became more isolated, totalitarian movements seemed to give people a sense of belonging and solidarity. She also warned of the dangers of propaganda distorting people's thinking and turning reality into fiction. Totalitarian regimes destroy reality and paralyze people's judgment by piling up lies. In addition, he saw the concentration camps as the core apparatus of totalitarianism. A concentration camp is not just a place to house prisoners, but a place to dehumanize and treat humans as "superfluous beings." There, human beings are deprived of their names and identities and treated as mere numbers and symbols. Arendt made it clear that totalitarianism has a terrible power to shake human existence and destroy humanity to its very foundations.

"The banality of evil" ~ The impact of "Eichmann in Jerusalem"

Another of Arendt's most famous works, and one that forms the center of her thought, is Eichmann in Jerusalem, published in 1963. This work was written by Arendt, who attended the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Israel. Eichmann played an important role in the Nazi Holocaust (genocide of Jews) involved in transportation and killing. Through the figure of Eichmann at the trial, Arendt proposed the shocking concept of the "banality of evil."

"Evil banality" refers to the fact that Eichmann was not a ruthless monster, but rather an "ordinary" bureaucrat. Arendt pointed out that Eichmann was only a being who blindly carried out orders and did not think deeply about the meaning of her actions. Even as he committed the horrific crime of the Holocaust, he regarded his actions as a "duty" and abandoned moral judgments. Through this "banality of evil," Arendt emphasized the danger of human beings becoming complicit in horrific crimes simply by following the orders of the organization. This suggests that even people with good intentions and beliefs can become tainted with evil if they stop thinking.

Arendt analyzed Eichmann by associating it with "lack of the ability to think." Eichmann was incapable of abstract thinking and moral judgments, and was focused only on doing the task at hand. She concluded that this suspension of thought is the biggest factor that makes humans complicit in evil. This concept of "banality of evil" has shaken conventional notions of ethics and morality, and continues to question the importance of individual responsibility and thinking in modern society. In our daily lives, we may be unknowingly complicit in evil by stopping our thoughts and simply following orders. Through this concept of "the banality of evil," Arendt emphasized the need for each of us to always take responsibility for our thoughts and actions.

Publicness and Freedom of Action ~ The Possibility of Human Life

In Arendt's thought, the concepts of "publicness" and "freedom of action" are as important as the problems of totalitarianism and evil. She defined the public as a space for individuals to express their opinions and act together through dialogue with others. This publicness can be seen in the agoras (squares) of the ancient Greek polis (city-states). Arendt saw "action" as the expression of one's own opinions and joint decision-making by citizens in the polis, and believed that this "action" was the basis of human life.

She saw action not as a mere physical movement or as a means to achieve a specific end, but as a creative force, opening up the possibilities of human life. Behavior is born in relationships with others and presupposes the existence of others. Through action, we can express our thoughts, understand the ideas of others, and jointly shape the world. Arendt pointed out that totalitarian regimes destroyed humanity by depriving them of this publicity and freedom of action.

The "public space" she emphasized is becoming increasingly important in modern society. In a digitalized society, we can easily connect with others, but at the same time, we are losing the opportunity to express our opinions and engage in serious dialogue with others. Communication on social media and the Internet can be confined to a place of self-assertion or information gathering, and it can be difficult to create dialogue and action in the true sense of the word. Arendt sounded the alarm about this situation and called for the need for us to regain our "public nature" and rebuild our "freedom of action." We can restore our human lives by valuing dialogue with others, expressing our opinions, and tackling social issues together.

Hannah Arendt's Jewish identity

Arendt's Jewish identity is also an important factor in understanding her thought. As a Jew who experienced Nazi persecution, she reflected deeply on the Jewish issue. She delved deep into Jewish history and culture, viewing Jewishness as part of self-perception rather than as something imposed from the outside. Arendt emphasized the need for Jews to reconstruct their identities as subjects of history, not just as victims. Her ideas raise not only the question of discrimination and prejudice, but also the question of how Jews themselves can face their own history and carve out a future.

Through her early work, Rahel Warnhagen, Arendt examined Jewish identity and its relationship with society through the lives of Jewish women. The film depicts how a Jewish woman was marginalized in society and tried to establish herself. Arendt suggested that Jewish identity is formed in social situations and in relationships with others.

Perspectives in Education ~ Spontaneity and the Power to Renew the World

Arendt's ideas also have important implications for education. She saw education not only as a way to pass on knowledge and experience from the past, but also as a place to nurture the ability of the next generation to usher in a new era. In her education, she emphasized fostering children's ability to think and act freely. Arendt criticized progressive education and advocated an education that supported children to learn independently, rather than adults suppressing children's initiative.

She believed that education should play a role in helping children learn from past knowledge and experiences, but not be bound by them, but to create new perspectives and ways of thinking. "Spontaneity," she emphasized, refers to children's ability to think for themselves, make their own decisions, and take responsibility for their actions. Arendt believed that through education, the next generation could re-examine the rules and structures of society and build a better future.

Arendt and the Modern Age ~ Questions in the Digital Age

Arendt's ideas are becoming increasingly important in today's world, especially in an increasingly digital society. Because the totalitarian structures of domination she warned about are manifesting themselves in different forms even in today's technological society. The collection and analysis of personal information by big data and AI has the potential to monitor and control our behavior, which can threaten our individual freedoms. While social media and online communication connect us with others, it also has the potential to create divisions.

Arendt's thought raises the question of how we should face digital technology and how we should use it. She emphasized the need for us to maintain a "public nature" and ensure "freedom of action" even in a digitalized society. We need to use digital technology wisely, not just as a tool, but as a means to expand the possibilities of human life.

Summary

Hannah Arendt's thought delves deeply into universal themes such as totalitarianism, evil, freedom, and publicness, and provides an important perspective for understanding contemporary society. Her ideas are not just theories, they influence our real lives and everyday choices, and their importance will continue to grow. Her writings and philosophical legacy should serve as a compass for us to learn the lessons of the past and build a better future. Arendt's questions will inspire us to think deeply about what each of us can do to build a more humane society, where we are always responsible for our thoughts and actions.

I want to read it together